Denver Federal Judge: “Stolen Valor” Act Ruled Unconstitutional

Posted: July 16, 2010 in MILITARY, NEWS, POLITICS

Friday, July 16, 2010 Stolen Valor act ruled unconstitutional Folks, get your gear.

First, we all need to raise all holy h311. Second, we need to make sure this goes to the Supreme Court. I have emails out the the Salamander JAG corps … so expect updates to this post as their briefs come in.

A federal judge in Denver has ruled the Stolen Valor Act is “facially unconstitutional” because it violates free speech and dismissed the criminal case against Rick Strandlof, a man who lied about being an Iraq war veteran.

U.S. District Judge Robert Blackburn issued his decision this morning.

“The Stolen Valor Act is declared to be facially unconstitutional as a content-based restriction on speech that does not serve a compelling government interest, and consequently that the Act is invalid as violative of the First Amendment,” Blackburn wrote in his opinion.

Where do we start? Dressing up in a uniform you did not earn and wearing medals you did not earn is not speech. It is theft.

This judge is a Bush 43 so there isn’t a “Democrat judges” angle on this. Also, the legal team for these a55hats comes from The Rutherford Institute.

They won with logic like this,

John Whitehead, president of the Rutherford Institute, said the law is poorly written and should not be used to prosecute people for simply telling lies.

“You have to redraft the law to prove a particularized damage,” he said. “If you run around Denver and yell out, ‘I got the Medal of Honor,’ you are guilty of the statute the way it is written.”

In a recent motion to dismiss the case, Strandlof’s attorney, Robert Pepin, wrote that “protecting the reputation of military decorations is insufficient to survive this exacting scrutiny.”

Rutherford Institute attorney Douglas McKusick argues that Strandlof’s lies did not “inflict harm” upon the medals he lied about or debase the meaning of the medals for the veterans who actually earned them.

“Such expression remains within the presumptive protection afforded pure speech by the First Amendment,” McKusick wrote. “As such, the Stolen Valor Act is an unconstitutional restraint on the freedom of speech.”

Once again – if you need to understand the damage these fakes cause to veterans – read Stolen Valor : How the Vietnam Generation Was Robbed of Its Heroes and Its History. More to follow, but I have a request. – Anyone have a link to the whole opinion by the Judge that came out today? UPDATE: Got the decision. I put it on googledocs – you can download it here. Posted by CDR Salamander at 14:40 Labels: Stolen Valor


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s